1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 221 Or.
  5. 221 Or. 81 (1960)
 

KLIKS v. McCAFFREY AND BETTIS

221 Or. 81 (1960)

350 P.2d 417

KLIKS v. McCAFFREY AND BETTIS

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 23, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald H. Joyce, Portland, argued the cause for appellant.

Harlow F. Lenon argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Lenon & Willner, Portland, and Wade P. Bettis, Canby.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, SLOAN and HOLMAN, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

HOLMAN, J. (Pro Tempore)

This is an action brought by the plaintiff Kliks against the defendants McCaffrey and Bettis. McCaffrey was a second-hand automobile dealer and as such was required to be bonded under ORS 481.310. Bettis was his bondsman. McCaffrey contacted plaintiff early one morning and told him he had an opportunity to make a good buy on two specific automobiles if he could get sufficient money to make the deal. He asked to borrow $3...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases