1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 179 Cal.App.2d
  5. 179 Cal.App.2d 110 (1960)
 

DENNIS v. OVERHOLTZER

Docket No. 9846.

179 Cal.App.2d 110 (1960)

3 Cal. Rptr. 458

PHYLLIS B. DENNIS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ARTHUR E. OVERHOLTZER et al., Appellants; W.V. DENNIS, JR., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

March 21, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard B. Crittenden, Jr., and Frank H. McAuliffe, for Appellants.

Otto A. Hoecker, Raymond J. O'Connor and Jay M. Jacobus for Respondents.

WARNE, J. pro tem.*

This is a companion appeal to the case of Dennis v. Overholtzer, 3 Civil Number 9716, decided by this court and reported in 178 Cal.App.2d 766 [3 Cal.Rptr. 193]. The facts of the case are fully presented in that opinion and we shall not repeat them here.

[1] In this appeal appellants attack the validity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases