1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 178 Cal.App.2d
  5. 178 Cal.App.2d 106 (1960)
 

FRIEDENBERG v. FRIEDENBERG

Docket No. 23912.

178 Cal.App.2d 106 (1960)

2 Cal. Rptr. 866

MERCEDES L. FRIEDENBERG, Appellant, v. HAMILTON A. FRIEDENBERG, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

February 17, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rogan & Radding and George J. Hider for Appellant.

Edmisten, Yudelson & Silverton and Collman E. Yudelson for Respondent.

BISHOP, J. pro tem.*

The plaintiff has appealed "from the whole" of the judgment. The judgment, with many provisions, declares that each party is entitled to a divorce; awards the plaintiff sums monthly for her support; and decrees many other things to her benefit. Of these various provisions she, understandably, makes no complaint in her briefs on this appeal; her sole claim is that the provisions affecting a quitclaim deed given to her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases