PRIMM v. WOCKNER

No. 35147.

56 Wn.2d 215 (1960)

351 P.2d 933

EDMUND REECE PRIMM, Respondent, v. EUGENE R. WOCKNER et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

May 12, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Yothers & Luckerath, for appellants.

Reseburg, Ingman, Duncan & Therriault, for respondent.


PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff secured a judgment for six hundred dollars as damages for a breach of the warranty that the automobile sold to him by the defendants was a new car. The defendants appeal.

The facts control the determination of this case. We find no substance in any of the five assignments of error; and they merit but brief consideration.

Assignment of error No. 2: The contract, in writing, between the parties called for a new automobile. Contrary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases