NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY v. GRAY

No. 23.

116 S.E.2d 146 (1960)

253 N.C. 60

NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY v. James H. GRAY, Jr. and Nina Gray Wallace, Trading as G. & S. Motor Company, a partnership, and Ford Motor Company.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 21, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. L. Coburn, Williamston, for plaintiff, appellant.

James & Speight and William C. Brewer, Jr., Greenville, for defendant Ford Motor Company, appellee.

Griffin & Martin, Williamston, for defendant G. & S. Motor Company, appellee.


PER CURIAM.

If the automobile was defective in any respect, the record fails to disclose any evidence, direct or circumstantial, tending to show what the defect consisted of. No causal connection between the excessive heating and the fire is made to appear. Furthermore, there is no contention that heat or fumes had ever been emitted while the car was not in operation. Recovery may not be predicated on conjecture. No evidence has been adduced from which the cause of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases