1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 224 Or.
  5. 224 Or. 37 (1960)
 

DRURY ET UX v. PEKAR ET AL

224 Or. 37 (1960)

355 P.2d 598

DRURY ET UX v. PEKAR ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed September 21, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dan W. Poling, Newport, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Herbert W. Carter, Salem.

Bruce W. Williams, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Williams & Skopil, Salem.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, GOODWIN and KING, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

KING, J. (Pro Tempore)

This suit is to determine the ownership of a narrow strip of land approximately 23.64 chains long, about 76 feet wide at the southerly end and approximately 20 feet wide at the northerly end, and damages for some merchantable timber removed. The timber value was not tried in this case.

The plaintiffs, James C. Drury and Beatrice C. Drury, purchased some property in the south...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases