GEIS v. MCKENNA


10 Wis.2d 16 (1960)

GEIS and wife, Appellants, v. MCKENNA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 5, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Robert D. Martinson of Eagle River, attorney, and Immell, Herro, Buehner & DeWitt of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Martinson.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Elliot N. Walstead of Milwaukee.


BROWN, J.

The case comes before us without a bill of exceptions. The trial court's findings of fact stand, therefore, as verities. Davis v. Davis (1951), 259 Wis. 1, 47 N.W.2d 338. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the supreme court is limited to ascertaining whether judgment is sustained by the pleadings and by the findings of fact. Id., State ex rel. Ignosiak v. Franklin (1954), 268 Wis. 295<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases