GILBERT v. ROGERS

No. 35129.

56 Wn.2d 185 (1960)

351 P.2d 535

W.G. GILBERT, Respondent, v. R.E. ROGERS et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

May 5, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Olwell & Boyle and Pomeroy & Harris, for appellants.

Parker Williams and Edward J. Novack, for respondent.


PER CURIAM:

[1] We have here another appeal involving only a factual dispute which the trial court resolved upon conflicting evidence. Again we restate the rule applicable under such circumstances: The appellate function begins and ends with ascertaining whether or not there is substantial evidence supporting the findings of fact. If so, the judgment must be affirmed. This court does not retry factual disputes.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases