1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 224 Md.
  5. 224 Md. 14 (1960)
 

DEHN v. MATUSAK

[No. 89, September Term, 1960.]

224 Md. 14 (1960)

165 A.2d 880

DEHN v. MATUSAK

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 15, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter I. Seif, Jr., with whom was Roland Walker on the brief, for the appellant.

Jeffrey B. Smith, with whom were Paul E. Burke, Jr., and Smith, Somerville & Case on the brief, for the appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The sole question raised by this appeal is whether or not the plaintiff-appellant, Dehn, was entitled to an instruction to the jury based on the doctrine of last clear chance. The trial court declined to give such an instruction, and the verdict of the jury was in favor of the defendant-appellee, Matusak.

Most of the facts are not in dispute. On Sunday evening, September 14, 1958, the plaintiff double-parked...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases