1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 33 N.J.
  5. 33 N.J. 204 (1960)
 

SCHROEDER v. ENGROFF

33 N.J. 204 (1960)

162 A.2d 845

HAROLD W. SCHROEDER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT W. ENGROFF AND ADELAIDE L. ENGROFF, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS, AND ROLAND HOSICK AND LILLIAN HOSICK, HIS WIFE, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued June 7, 1960.

Decided June 28, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harold W. Schroeder, plaintiff-respondent, argued the cause pro se.

Mr. Ernest F. Keer, Jr., argued the cause for defendants-appellants, Robert W. Engroff and Adelaide L. Engroff (Messrs. Boyd, Dodd, Keer & Booth, attorneys).

Mr. Harry Schaffer argued the cause for New Jersey Title Insurance Association, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

At the trial of this case there was presented a substantial issue related to the admissibility of certain parol evidence. This evidence was designed to establish the location of an iron stake marking the terminal point of the second course of the land conveyed by the deed out of which the controversy arose. The trial court received the proof subject to a later determination of its competency. At the conclusion of the matter he decided that it was not admissible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases