1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 222 Md.
  5. 222 Md. 12 (1960)
 

CHAPMAN v. ROGAN

[No. 135, September Term, 1959.]

222 Md. 12 (1960)

158 A.2d 626

CHAPMAN ET UX. v. ROGAN ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Motion for rehearing filed April 8, 1960.

Denied April 13, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Frederick Taylor, with whom were Martin & Taylor, on the brief, for appellants.

J. Francis Ford, for Joseph H.A. Rogan and Cecilia M. Rogan, part of the appellees.

Carville M. Downes, Assistant County Solicitor, with whom were Johnson Bowie, County Solicitor, and William E. Hammond, Assistant County Solicitor, on the brief, for Baltimore County, Maryland, other appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND and HORNEY, JJ.

BRUNE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a controversy primarily between neighbors over the use of an alley, and more particularly over the stub end of the alley which constitutes a cul-de-sac. The complainants-appellants, Mr. and Mrs. J. Lee Chapman, brought this suit in equity in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County against Mr. and Mrs. Joseph H.A. Rogan and against Baltimore County as respondents for declaratory and injunctive relief. The Chapmans...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases