1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 185 F.Supp.
  5. 185 F.Supp. 7 (1960)
 

HONOLULU OIL CORP. v. SHELBY POULTRY CO.

Civ. No. 1182.

185 F.Supp. 7 (1960)

HONOLULU OIL CORPORATION and Barker Poultry Equipment Company, Plaintiffs, v. SHELBY POULTRY COMPANY, a Partnership consisting of William L. Shaw and L. E. Needham, Defendants, and Pickwick Company, Defendant-Intervenor.

United States District Court W. D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division.

July 8, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eaton, Bell, Hunt & Seltzer, Charlotte, N. C., Watson, Cole, Grindle & Watson, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

McDougle, Ervin, Horack & Snepp, Charlotte, N. C., Haight, Lockwood & Simmons, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

WARLICK, District Judge.

This is a patent suit in which the plaintiffs charge infringement. The defendants set up the defenses of invalidity, non-infringement, unfair competition, and alteration of original application specifications.

The plaintiff, Honolulu Oil Corporation is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in San Francisco, California. The plaintiff, Barker Poultry Equipment Company is an Iowa corporation with its main office...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases