1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 181 F.Supp.
  5. 181 F.Supp. 5 (1960)
 

REDMAN v. STEDMAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY

No. C-846-G.

181 F.Supp. 5 (1960)

Frank R. REDMAN and Redman Process American Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. STEDMAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court M. D. North Carolina, Greensboro Division.

February 19, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McLendon, Brim, Holderness & Brooks, Greensboro, N. C., and Taylor, Scoll & Simon, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Welch Jordan, Greensboro, N. C., and Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Barrows & Taylor, New York City, for defendant.

Herbert S. Falk, Greensboro, N. C., and Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City, for Tubular Textile Machinery Corp., Eugene Cohn and Joseph Cohn.

STANLEY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court (1) on the petition of the plaintiffs, Frank R. Redman and Redman Process American Corporation (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Redman"), for an order to show cause why the Tubular Textile Machinery Corporation (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Tubular"), and its officers, Eugene Cohn and Joseph Cohn, should not be adjudged in civil contempt and punished for violation of a writ of injunction addressed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases