1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 10 Wis.2d
  5. 10 Wis.2d 171 (1960)
 

SCHULTZ v. VICK

10 Wis.2d 171 (1960)

SCHULTZ and another, Appellants, v. VICK and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 5, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Schubring, Petersen, Sutherland & Axley, and oral argument by Floyd A. Brynelson, all of Madison.

For the respondents there was a brief by Roberts, Boardman, Suhr, Bjork & Curry of Madison, and oral argument by Robert L. Curry.

DIETERICH, J.

The issue in this case is whether defendants had a vested constitutional right in the statutory notice requirement under the provisions of sec. 330.19 (5), Stats. 1955, which provides:

". . . No action to recover damages for an injury to the person shall be maintained unless, within two years after the happening of the event causing such damages, notice in writing, signed by the party damaged, . . ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases