OSSINSKY v. NANCE

No. B-131.

118 So.2d 47 (1960)

Louis OSSINSKY, Sr., and Joseph D. Krol, Appellants, v. Dayton NANCE, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Rehearing Denied February 11, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ossinsky & Krol, Daytona Beach, for appellants.

Kinsey, Vincent & Pyle, Daytona Beach, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

Finding no error in entry of summary judgment in favor of the appellee, plaintiff below, the same is hereby affirmed.

On the appellee's cross-assignment of error, directed to the fact that the costs of the proceeding were taxed against appellee who prevailed in the lower court, Section 58.04, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides that the party recovering the judgment shall recover also on his legal costs and charges. This statutory provision follows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases