CARLISLE, Judge.
In the view which we take of this case, the evidence did not authorize the verdict for the plaintiff but in fact demanded a verdict for the defendant, and the trial court, consequently, erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant and in thereafter refusing to grant a judgment for the defendant in accordance with the motion for a directed verdict.
As contended by counsel for both parties, there were three issues of fact in the case...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
