1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 63 N.J.
  5. 63 N.J. Super. 90 (1960)
 

STATE v. DE LUCIA

63 N.J. Super. 90 (1960)

164 A.2d 81

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MARIO DE LUCIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 22, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Mario De Lucia, appellant pro se.

Mr. Stanley E. Rutkowski, Mercer County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Mr. Edward J. Phelan, Assistant Prosecutor on the brief).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and HETFIELD.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial, without formal answer by the State and without a hearing, of his application for a writ of habeas corpus by the Superior Court, Law Division. He claims that the court which originally sentenced him did not have jurisdiction with respect to several of the offenses to which he pleaded guilty. He also alleges that, with respect to one offense, he was not properly charged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases