BLANDIN, J.
This appeal presents to the court the issue of whether, the Commission having decided that the company was entitled to the protection of temporary rates, acted reasonably in not applying its temporary rate order to service rendered during the first quarter of 1960. The company has not appealed to the Commission's failure to prescribe a higher level of temporary rates. The test to determine whether the plaintiff's appeal should be
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.