1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 102 Ga.
  5. 102 Ga. App. 40 (1960)
 

ORR v. SMITH

38254.

102 Ga. App. 40 (1960)

115 S.E.2d 601

ORR et al. v. SMITH.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Rehearing Denied July 5, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. W. Rolader, for plaintiffs in error.

Smith, Field, Ringel, Martin & Carr, Palmer H. Ansley, contra.

FELTON, Chief Judge.

The only question argued by counsel is whether the contract of listing is too vague and indefinite to support a cause of action for the recovery of sales commissions. The contention of the defendant in error is that (1) the description of the property is too vague and indefinite and (2) that the price is too vague and indefinite, but only the first point is argued. The second contention is obviously without merit.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases