STICE v. PETERSON

Nos. 18770, 18771.

355 P.2d 948 (1960)

H. E. STICE, Plaintiff in Error, v. Elmer H. PETERSON, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department.

October 10, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Philip Kurz, Robert A. Lehman, Denver, for plaintiff in error.

William E. Doyle, Richard J. Bernick, Denver, for defendant in error.


PER CURIAM.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, where plaintiff in error was plaintiff and defendant in error was defendant.

Two separate cases were consolidated in the trial court, but are before this court on separate writs of error. Plaintiff seeks review of adverse judgments. The cases are consolidated here for the purpose of review.

The first case (18770) is a money demand...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases