CAHILL v. KILGORE

No. 38730.

350 P.2d 928 (1960)

Dick CAHILL et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Estella Mae KILGORE, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 29, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthurs, Blackstock & McMillan, Bristow, and T.R. Benedum, Norman, for plaintiffs in error.

W.L. Cheatham, Bristow, for defendant in error.


BERRY, Justice.

We will refer herein to plaintiff in error, M.M. Cahill, administratrix of the estate of Dick Cahill, deceased, as defendant and the defendant in error, Estella Mae Kilgore, will be referred to as plaintiff. All other parties will be referred to by name.

In her petition, plaintiff pleaded three causes of action. The first cause of action was for a personal judgment against M.M. Cahill in her individual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases