1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 275 F.2d
  5. 275 F.2d 955 (1960)
 

DAGGETT & RAMSDELL, INC. v. PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY

Patent Appeal No. 6526.

275 F.2d 955 (1960)

DAGGETT & RAMSDELL, INC. v. PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

March 15, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mead, Browne, Schuyler & Beveridge, William E. Schuyler, Jr., Andrew B. Beveridge, Washington, D. C. (Francis C. Browne, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Allen & Allen, Cincinnati, Ohio (Erastus S. Allen, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel), for appellee.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and SMITH, Judges, and Judge FRANCIS L. VAN DUSEN.

MARTIN, Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, acting through the Assistant Commissioner, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing the opposition by Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc., to the registration of "Personal Blend."

The Procter & Gamble Co. on December 13, 1954, filed an application for the registration of the mark "Personal Blend" on "Shampoo," alleging the first use in commerce to be on August...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases