1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 24 Misc.2d
  5. 24 Misc.2d 98 (1960)
 

DEMPSEY v. GREAT A & P TEA CO.

24 Misc.2d 98 (1960)

Thomas Dempsey, Plaintiff, v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

March 21, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Saxe, Bacon & O'Shea for plaintiff.

Boudin, Cohn and Glickstein for Local Union No. 400, defendant.

Bader & Belson for Local Union No. 489, defendant.

Roy M. Cohn for plaintiff.

Cahill, Gordon, Reindel & Ohl (Jerome Doyle and H. Richard Schumacher of counsel), for Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, defendant.

THOMAS A. AURELIO, J.

The defendant The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company moves for dismissal of the complaint pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, upon the ground that the court has not jurisdiction of the subject matter. By separate motion, the defendants Local Union No. 400 and Local Union No. 489 move for dismissal of the complaint upon the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases