MILWAUKEE v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMM


11 Wis.2d 111 (1960)

CITY OF MILWAUKEE, as a Water Public Utility, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent. [Four cases, Nos. 24, 25, 26, and 27.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 28, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by John J. Fleming, city attorney, and Harry G. Slater, deputy city attorney, and oral argument by Mr. Slater.

For the respondent Public Service Commission the cause was argued by William E. Torkelson, chief counsel, with whom on the brief was John W. Reynolds, attorney general.

For the respondent village of Whitefish Bay there was a brief and oral argument by Harry J. Hayes, village attorney, and for the respondent village of Fox Point by Fraley N. Weidner, village attorney.

For the respondent city of Glendale there was a brief and oral argument by George D. Prentice, city attorney.


BROADFOOT, J.

Orders or determinations of the Public Service Commission are reviewable in the manner provided in ch. 227, Stats. All references herein to statutes are to the 1957 statutes. Sec. 227.15, Stats., provides:

"Administrative decisions, which directly affect the legal rights, duties, or privileges of any person, ... shall be subject to judicial review as provided in this chapter; ..."

Sec. 227.16...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases