Defendants challenge the legal sufficiency of each of the two causes of action set forth in the amended complaint. They do so — with respect to the first cause of action — on the ground that parts of paragraphs "9" and "10" thereof are defective because conclusory, and that as owner of a franchise and easements not appurtenant to the land, plaintiff cannot maintain an action...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
