1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 281 F.2d
  5. 281 F.2d 871 (1960)
 

STEINBRUGGE v. HADDOCK

No. 6279.

281 F.2d 871 (1960)

E. Donald STEINBRUGGE, Appellant, v. John S. HADDOCK and Alma J. Haddock, as Executrix of the Estate of Marshall Haddock, Jr., deceased, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

July 26, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Garrett Logan and Richard L. Hull, Tulsa, Okl. (Villard Martin and Jack H. Santee, Tulsa, Okl., on the brief), for appellant.

G. C. Spillers, Jr., Tulsa, Okl. (G. C. Spillers and Jack R. Givens, Tulsa, Okl., on the brief), for appellees.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Steinbrugge brought this diversity suit to rescind six purchases of Oklahoma oil and gas interests from appellees, the Haddocks, on the grounds that the Haddocks' agent in the transactions, Kunsman, had breached fiducial duties owed by him to Steinbrugge. More particularly, appellant contends that in each of the six transactions, Kunsman was acting as his agent or at least in some fiducial capacity, giving rise to strict duties to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases