MAULDING v. ATLANTA TRANSIT SYSTEM

38001.

101 Ga. App. 11 (1960)

112 S.E.2d 666

MAULDING v. ATLANTA TRANSIT SYSTEM, INC.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided January 12, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bullock, Yancey & Mitchell, Kyle Yancey, Harris Bullock, for plaintiff in error.

Hugh M. Dorsey, Jr., Jule W. Felton, Jr., contra.


NICHOLS, Judge.

1. The general grounds of the amended motion for a new trial have not been argued and are consequently abandoned. Special ground 4 complains that the court erred in giving the following charge to the jury: "I charge you, Gentlemen, that even if you find that the defendant was guilty of some negligence, but you also find that the plaintiff, Joseph Don Maulding, was guilty of negligence and that said plaintiff's negligence was equal to or greater than...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases