1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 33 N.J.
  5. 33 N.J. 74 (1960)
 

IN RE RICH

33 N.J. 74 (1960)

161 A.2d 488

IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGED UNETHICAL CONDUCT OF WILLIAM W. RICH, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 6, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frank S. Katzenbach, III, argued the cause for respondent, William W. Rich.

Mr. George Warren argued the cause for the Mercer County Ethics and Grievance Committee.

PER CURIAM.

Seven complaints were filed against respondent charging him with unethical practices. They covered a variety of accusations. Two alleged improper use of substantial trust funds for private and personal purposes; two related to the acceptance of fees for the prosecution of divorce actions which were never instituted, although numerous false representations to the contrary were made to the clients; one alleged obtaining...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases