1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 178 Cal.App.2d
  5. 178 Cal.App.2d 881 (1960)
 

McNEE v. HAROLD HENSGEN & ASSOCIATES

Docket No. 23928.

178 Cal.App.2d 881 (1960)

3 Cal. Rptr. 377

GEORGE A. McNEE, Appellant, v. HAROLD HENSGEN AND ASSOCIATES (a Partnership) et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

March 16, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Spector for Appellant.

Tannenbaum, Steinberg & Shearer, Jacob Shearer and Bertram Fields for Respondents.

BISHOP, J. pro tem.*

The appeal is by the plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal that was entered after a demurrer had been sustained to his second amended complaint, without leave to amend. The demurrer was special as well as general, but the sufficiency of the second amended complaint to state a cause of action is the only question argued on appeal. The answer to that question depends upon the construction to be

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases