1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 187 F.Supp.
  5. 187 F.Supp. 868 (1960)
 

MOORE v. JACK P. HENNESSY CO.

Civ. A. Nos. 724-58, 526-59.

187 F.Supp. 868 (1960)

Roosevelt MOORE, Plaintiff, v. JACK P. HENNESSY CO., Inc., Defendant. Roosevelt MOORE, Plaintiff, v. ATLAS SUPPLY COMPANY, Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

September 30, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson & Johnson, M. Bernadine Johnson, Newark, N. J., for plaintiff.

Hennessy & Mowry, Frank H. Hennessy, Englewood, N. J., Albert Parker and John P. Chandler, New York City, for defendants.

MEANEY, District Judge.

After various proceedings and amendments, the claims of the plaintiff, Roosevelt Moore,1 subsist as an action against Jack P. Hennessy Co., Inc., and, in a separate action, against Atlas Supply Company, Inc., for infringement on the plaintiff's patent rights in and to improvements on certain devices known as circumferentially traveling type tire mounting devices. The two actions have been consolidated for trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases