The trier of the fact found that the written employment agreement, containing the restrictive clause invoked by plaintiff, was made by the parties herein, who are physicians, but that such agreement had been abrogated and superseded by a subsequent oral agreement of partnership which was effectuated by certain acts and which was established by documents reflecting partnership transactions. Judgment affirmed, with costs...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.