HERNDON, J.
After a nonjury trial, appellant was convicted of first degree robbery. Appealing from the judgment of conviction, he advances the sole contention that "there is no substantial evidence to sustain the findings of fact upon which the judgment was necessarily predicated." The record eloquently contradicts this ill-founded contention. It discloses proof of guilt more than sufficient to satisfy the "substantial evidence" rule.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
