MATTER OF ZUCKER v. BLOCH


24 Misc.2d 1008 (1960)

In the Matter of Harold Zucker, Petitioner, v. Abraham M. Bloch, Individually and as Chief Magistrate of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

July 13, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ira H. Holley for petitioner. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Allan N. Smiley of counsel), for respondents. Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel (Rose Schneph and Murray Rudman of counsel), for City of New York.


IRVING H. SAYPOL, J.

Motion as an application for an order of prohibition (Civ. Prac. Act, art. 78, §§ 1283-1306) is denied, the stay is vacated and the respondents' cross motion is granted and the petition is dismissed.

The petitioner is at large on bail awaiting examination before a Magistrate on the criminal charge of possessing obscene books with intent to sell them. Anticipatory to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases