FOTHERGILL v. McKAY PRESS

Docket No. 6, Calendar No. 48,171.

361 Mich. 666 (1960)

106 N.W.2d 215

FOTHERGILL v. McKAY PRESS.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided December 1, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis & Wetmore (James W. Baker, John E. Riecker and Floyd E. Wetmore, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Currie & Currie, for defendant.


BLACK, J. (concurring).

In Warner v. Texas & Pacific R. Co. (1896), 164 U.S. 418 (17 S.Ct. 147, 41 L ed 495), the supreme court had occasion to review generally the authoritative history of this particular provision of the statute of frauds.* The following conclusion was reached (pp 422, 423):

"It thus appears to have been the settled construction of this clause of the statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases