1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 113 S.E.2d
  5. 113 S.E.2d 906 (1960)
 

HAYNES v. WINSTON-SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY CO.

No. 379.

113 S.E.2d 906 (1960)

252 N.C. 391

Paul D. HAYNES, by his next friend, Pauline Haynes, v. WINSTON-SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY COMPANY.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 27, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elledge & Mast, Winston-Salem, Walser & Brinkley, Lexington, Clyde C. Randolph, Jr., Winston-Salem, for plaintiff.

Craige, Brawley, Lucas & Hendrix, Winston-Salem, Phillips, Bower & Klass, Lexington, for defendant.

DENNY, Justice.

The Rules of the Operating Department of the defendant railroad provide for discharge on the following grounds: "Disloyalty, dishonesty, desertion, intemperance, immorality, vicious or uncivil conduct, insubordination, incompetency, wilful neglect, inexcusable violation of rules resulting in endangering, damaging or destroying life or property, making false statements, or concealing facts concerning matters...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases