1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 358 Mich.
  5. 358 Mich. 653 (1960)
 

FORD MOTOR CO. v. VILLAGE OF WAYNE

Docket Nos. 39, 40, Calendar Nos. 48,314, 48,315.

358 Mich. 653 (1960)

101 N.W.2d 320

FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. VILLAGE OF WAYNE. DIEHL v. SAME.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided February 25, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William T. Gossett (Richard B. Darragh and Edward C. Hanpeter, of counsel), for plaintiff Ford Motor Company.

William Sempliner, for plaintiffs Diehl and other taxpayers.

Russel W. Schmidt, for defendants Village of Wayne, its officials, and the proposed charter commissioners.

Nellis & Nellis (John J. Nellis, of counsel), for defendants Township of Nankin and its officials.

CARR, J.

These cases have resulted from proceedings instituted to incorporate into a city the present village of Wayne in Nankin township, Wayne county, and contiguous lands in said township not embraced within the village limits. Involved is the interpretation, and application, of provisions of the so-called city home rule act.* Said proceeding was initiated by a petition, in accordance with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases