HAFSTAD v. HAFSTAD


20 Misc.2d 979 (1959)

Vivien F. Hafstad, Plaintiff, v. Arthur E. Hafstad, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

August 11, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur I. Winard for plaintiff.

Thomas D. Conway for defendant.


HENRY J. LATHAM, J.

This is an action to recover additional alimony claimed to be due under a decree of divorce entered in plaintiff's favor in the State of Alabama upon the appearance of the defendant herein and for counsel fees she has been obligated to incur for the enforcement of her rights under said decree. While admitting the salient facts pleaded in the complaint, defendant has denied in his answer that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases