1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 8 A.D.2d
  5. 8 A.D.2d 985 (1959)
 

RICHMAN v. FELMUS

8 A.D.2d 985 (1959)

Louis Richman, Respondent, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Laurence B. Felmus et al., Defendants, and Joe Weinstein et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Arthur Witmondt, Respondent, v. Joe Weinstein et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 28, 1959

Appeal dismissed, without costs.

We find no reason, in this record, for deviation from the general rule that no appeal lies from an order denying a motion without prejudice to renewal (Blair v. Holzberg, 4 A.D.2d 674

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases