ENG HONG v. LEN SERV. CORP.


19 Misc.2d 959 (1959)

Eng Hong, Appellant, v. Len Service Corp., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 11, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milton S. Eisenstat and Alan Leonard Levy for appellant.

Raymond J. MacDonnell and Hewitt L. Rubel for respondent.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J. P., HECHT and AURELIO, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The court below properly granted the motion to set aside the verdict as excessive but in our view $250, the amount fixed by the court to be accepted by plaintiff, is inadequate.

Undoubtedly there was exaggeration of injuries and expenses for medical aid but the record reveals that plaintiff did suffer damages as a result of injuries received in an accident for which he was in no manner responsible.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases