1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 178 F.Supp.
  5. 178 F.Supp. 799 (1959)
 

RICHFIELD OIL CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES

No. 513-55.

178 F.Supp. 799 (1959)

RICHFIELD OIL CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

December 2, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Franklin Fort, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff. Kominers & Fort, J. Alton Boyer and T. S. L. Perlman, Washington, D. C., were on the briefs.

Francis J. Steiner, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. George Cochran Doub, for defendant.

LITTLETON, Judge (Retired).

The plaintiff sues to recover just compensation for the alleged taking by the United States of the plaintiff's oil pipeline which was attached to a bridge of the Union Pacific Railroad Company over the Rio Hondo, a stream in Los Angeles County, California.

The pipeline had been attached to the railroad's bridge pursuant to an agreement dated August 1, 1949, between the railroad and the plaintiff. That agreement designated plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases