1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 176 F.Supp.
  5. 176 F.Supp. 801 (1959)
 

PINNEY & TOPLIFF v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION

No. 850-58.

176 F.Supp. 801 (1959)

PINNEY & TOPLIFF, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, a corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

September 17, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gold, Needleman & Fain, by Harry M. Fain, and J. Howard Sturman, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiff.

McCutchen, Black, Harnagel & Shea, by G. Wm. Shea, John Lawrence Leary, Los Angeles, Cal., and Keith A. Jenkins, Detroit, Mich., for defendant.

YANKWICH, District Judge.

In this case we are to determine whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover under a Complaint seeking damages for fraud, either actual or constructive, or deceit,1 or, in the alternative, on the theory of promissory estoppel,2 or under the federal Automobile Dealers Act.3

At the request of the parties the Court has agreed to try the separate ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases