Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
In our opinion, there is an issue of fact as to whether the materials were delivered by appellant "with the consent or at the request of" respondent (see Lien Law, § 3). And, if appellant establishes its contention that respondent induced delivery of the materials, respondent would be estopped from asserting that its mortgage is prior and superior to appellant's lien (Ash v. Honig,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.