SMALL v. MALLORY

No. 612.

108 S.E.2d 852 (1959)

250 N.C. 570

Boyce E. SMALL v. Louise Threadgill MALLORY.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 12, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stern & Rendleman, Greensboro, for plaintiff appellee.

Martin & Whitley, High Point, for defendant appellant.


WINBORNE, Chief Justice.

The sole question presented for decision on this appeal challenges the correctness of the ruling of the trial court in overruling defendant's motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of plaintiff's evidence. In connection therewith it is appropriate to say that the "family purpose doctrine" with respect to automobiles has been adopted as the law in this jurisdiction, and applied in numerous cases— among which are these: Robertson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases