KIRSCH v. BARNES

No. 15891.

263 F.2d 692 (1959)

Bernard KIRSCH, Appellant, v. George BARNES, Milton L. Huber, G. Edward Goodwin, Milton L. Huber & G. Edward Goodwin, A Copartnership Doing Business as Huber & Goodwin, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

February 3, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Livingston, Harold R. Farrow, James R. Mansfield, Robert R. Barton, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Hill & Hill, Clayton R. Janssen, Jr., Eureka, Cal., Philip C. Wilkins, Esther Mix, Sacramento, Cal., for appellees.

Before POPE, ORR and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges.


ORR, Circuit Judge.

An original complaint filed in the district court was held not to state a cause of action. An amended complaint was also held defective in that respect.

In this opinion we do not reach a consideration of the trial court's ruling as to the failure to plead a cause of action for the reason that we find that the action was not seasonably filed.

It is alleged in the amended complaint that prior to October 16, 1952, appellee Barnes acted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases