SLATER v. MURPHY

No. 34861.

55 Wn.2d 892 (1959)

339 P.2d 457

EMORY C. SLATER et al., Appellants, v. LEO W. MURPHY et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

May 21, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shiner & Arneil and Murray & Hanna (Robert F. Murray, of counsel), for appellants.

Bell, McNeil & Bowles and Engst & Phelps, for respondents.


HILL, J.

We are here concerned with the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant the reformation of a deed, and with the sufficiency of the evidence to justify a finding of adverse possession.

The locus in quo is a triangular tract of land lying west of north Wenatchee avenue (which will hereafter be referred to as the highway), in an addition to the city of Wenatchee.

The side of the triangle, which runs approximately north and south is 87.5...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases