GENNRICH v. SCHRANK


6 Wis.2d 87 (1959)

GENNRICH and another, Respondents, v. SCHRANK and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 2, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Genrich, Terwilliger, Wakeen, Piehler & Conway, attorneys, and Paul D. Hilton of counsel, all of Wausau, and oral argument by Herbert L. Terwilliger.

For the respondent August Gennrich there was a brief by O'Melia & Kaye of Rhinelander, and oral argument by Donald C. O'Melia.

For the respondent Irene Gennrich there was a brief by Schmitt & Wurster of Merrill, and oral argument by Leonard F. Schmitt.


BROADFOOT, J.

The defendants contend that the trial court erred in determining that a jury issue was not presented by the evidence as to the negligence of the plaintiff August Gennrich with respect to lookout and management and control.

The repair bill for the Gennrich automobile was put in evidence. Among other items replaced was the front bumper and grille bar. Schrank testified that just before the impact he was going up a slight grade and that he had reduced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases