1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 7 A.D.2d
  5. 7 A.D.2d 917 (1959)
 

MEYER v. MERRITT

7 A.D.2d 917 (1959)

Herman Meyer, Respondent, v. Philip Merritt et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Louis L. Brizel, Appellant, v. U. S. Hat Band Mills, Inc., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.) Dwight Gardner, an Infant by His Guardian ad Litem, Marion Gardner et al., Respondents, v. Addie M. Merritt, et al., Respondents. (Action No. 3.) Rosita Brizel et al., Appellants, v. U. S. Hat Band Mills, Inc., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 4.) U. S. Hat Band Mills, Inc., Respondent, v. Addie Merritt et al., Respondents. (Action No. 5.) Richard O. Riley, an Infant, by Willie O. Riley, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, v. Addie M. Merritt et al., Respondents. (Action No. 6.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 2, 1959

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondents Addie M. Merritt and Philip Merritt.

The discretion of the Special Term was properly exercised (Littman v. Jacobowski, 2 A.D.2d 898; Shea v. Benjamin, 275 App. Div. 1003; Maiorano v. William Sherman, Inc., 196 Misc. 659

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases