HOHMANN & BARNARD v. COMBINED WELDER


19 Misc.2d 904 (1959)

Hohmann & Barnard, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Combined Welder & Machine Corp., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

September 9, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph L. Gould for defendant.

McCarthy, Kapelman & Nathanson for plaintiff.


J. IRWIN SHAPIRO, J.

Motion "for an order vacating and setting aside the service of the summons herein on the ground that the said defendant was enticed into the office of the attorney for the plaintiff for the purpose of deceitfully effecting such service."

The plaintiff argues that defendant was not enticed into the office of its attorney and the defendant argues that its officer was so enticed. A question of fact is thus raised which could...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases