Judgment affirmed, with costs.
No opinion.
Wenzel, Acting P. J., and Kleinfeld, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial, with the following memorandum:
While it is true that appellant could not identify the person at whose request she signed the general release, she did testify that he stated that he represented her daughter-in-law, the respondent herein. There was no reason for appellant to suspect that he represented...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
