1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 214 Ga.
  5. 214 Ga. 693 (1959)
 

HORTMAN v. YARBROUGH

20315.

214 Ga. 693 (1959)

107 S.E.2d 202

HORTMAN v. YARBROUGH et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided February 6, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nelson & Nelson, Carl K. Nelson, Ross & Ross, A. Russell Ross, for plaintiff in error.

Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, J. R. Parham, John L. York, Assistant Attorneys-General, Paul M. Conaway, contra.

WYATT, Presiding Justice.

1. The contention of the plaintiff in error that the act of the General Assembly under attack is unconstitutional because "it violates the due-process clauses of the Constitution of the United States and the privileges and immunities clauses thereof, as set forth in the 5th and 14th amendments thereto [Code, Ann., §§ 1-805, 1-808] . . . and the said act likewise violates the due-process clause of the Constitution of Georgia (Code...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases